From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. James

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Dec 27, 1967
237 A.2d 257 (N.J. 1967)

Opinion

Argued December 19, 1967 —

Decided December 27, 1967.

Mr. Edward I. Feinberg for defendant-appellant.

Mr. Solomon Forman for plaintiff-respondent ( Mr. Robert N. McAllister, Jr., Atlantic County Prosecutor, attorney; Mr. Solomon Forman on the brief).


After a joint trial with several others, appellant Vernon Lee James was convicted of sodomy. The convictions of two of the co-defendants, John Shannon and John Henry Taylor, were reversed by this Court. State v. Taylor, 46 N.J. 316 (1966). On this direct appeal, which we allowed, James urges the same grounds for reversal as did Shannon and John Henry Taylor. We agree that the conviction of James was tainted with the same error which required the reversal in State v. Taylor, supra. Therefore the judgment of conviction must be reversed.

For reversal — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, GOLDMANN, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For affirmance — None.


Summaries of

State v. James

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Dec 27, 1967
237 A.2d 257 (N.J. 1967)
Case details for

State v. James

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. VERNON LEE JAMES…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Dec 27, 1967

Citations

237 A.2d 257 (N.J. 1967)
237 A.2d 257

Citing Cases

Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services

State v. McKinlay, 51 N.J. 25, 237 A.2d 264 (1968) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned). State v.…