From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hunter

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Feb 13, 1996
670 A.2d 1307 (Conn. 1996)

Opinion

Decided February 13, 1996


The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 907 (AC 13358), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"Under the circumstances of this case: 1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court was correct in denying the defendant's request for an evidentiary hearing regarding the admissibility of the defendant's polygraph evidence?

"2. Should this court reconsider the applicability of the test for determining the admissibility of scientific evidence set forth in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923), in light of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993)?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15364.

Richard M. Morano, special public defender, in support of the petition.

Lisa Herskowitz, deputy assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Summaries of

State v. Hunter

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Feb 13, 1996
670 A.2d 1307 (Conn. 1996)
Case details for

State v. Hunter

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. RUSSELL C. HUNTER

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Feb 13, 1996

Citations

670 A.2d 1307 (Conn. 1996)
670 A.2d 1307

Citing Cases

State v. Hunter

"2. Should this court reconsider the applicability of the test for determining the admissibility of…