From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hunt

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 3, 1997
687 So. 2d 851 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

CASE NO. 96-1036

Opinion filed January 3, 1997

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, Edwin P. B. Sanders, Judge.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Carey Haughwout of Tierney Haughwout West Palm Beach, for Appellee.


Deidre Michelle Hunt was permitted to withdraw her plea, and as a result the trial court suppressed statements she made to law enforcement subsequent to her plea. We affirm the court's order which prohibits the State from introducing such statements during its case in chief. However, such statements may become admissible for the purpose of impeachment. See Harris v. New York, 401 U.S. 222, 91 S.Ct. 643, 28 L.Ed.2d 1 (1971) (a statement which was inadmissible in the prosecution's case in chief because it was obtained before defendant was advised of his right to remain silent, but which otherwise satisfied legal standards of trustworthiness, was properly usable for impeachment purposes to attack the credibility of the defendant's trial testimony). See also Washington

v. State, 432 So.2d 44 (Fla. 1983) (defendant's otherwise inadmissible statements could be used in rebuttal after he testified in his own defense).

AFFIRMED.

COBB and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Hunt

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 3, 1997
687 So. 2d 851 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

State v. Hunt

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. DEIDRE MICHELLE HUNT, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jan 3, 1997

Citations

687 So. 2d 851 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

People v. Scheller

It follows that because the statements were made in connection with the plea, such statements should be…