From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hills

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Feb 21, 1995
892 S.W.2d 821 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 64206.

February 21, 1995.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, ST. LOUIS COUNTY; STEVEN H. GOLDMAN, JUDGE.

Emmett D. Queener, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David G. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.


ORDER


Appellant, Samuel Hills, appeals from a jury trial conviction of the class B felony of delivery of a controlled substance, RSMo § 195.211 (Cum.Supp. 1990), entered by the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis and for which appellant was sentenced as a class X offender to twelve years in the Missouri Department of Corrections. Appellant also appeals from the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment of the circuit court is not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the circuit court's judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b). A memorandum solely for the use the parties here involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.


Summaries of

State v. Hills

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Feb 21, 1995
892 S.W.2d 821 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

State v. Hills

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT, v. SAMUEL HILLS, APPELLANT. SAMUEL HILLS…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Feb 21, 1995

Citations

892 S.W.2d 821 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

Peterson v. Peterson

We will therefore proceed to a determination of appellant's points of error. In determining the "no evidence"…