From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hill

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three
Nov 30, 1970
477 P.2d 29 (Wash. Ct. App. 1970)

Opinion

No. 230-41048-3.

November 30, 1970.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Yakima County, No. 14877, Lloyd L. Wiehl, J., entered September 9, 1969.

Terry P. Watkins, for appellant (appointed counsel for appeal).

Lincoln E. Shropshire, Prosecuting Attorney, and Robert Hackett, Deputy, for respondent.


Reversed.

Prosecution for violation of the Uniform Narcotic Drug Act. Defendant appeals from a conviction and sentence.


The appellant, James Hill, was found guilty by a jury of the sale of marijuana. Based on the jury verdict, the judgment from which this appeal was taken was entered on April 10, 1969, for unlawful sale of narcotics as set forth in RCW 69.33.230 (the Uniform Narcotic Drug Act). In State v. Zornes, 78 Wn.2d 9, 456, 475 P.2d 109 (1970), the Supreme Court held that the narcotic drug act (RCW 69.33) becomes inapplicable to a criminal offense involving marijuana, whether the proceeding be at the prosecution stage or pending appeal, as of the effective date of Laws of 1969, 1st Ex. Ses., ch. 256, § 7(13) which removed marijuana from the scope of that act. Since the appeal is now pending, judgment must be reversed and the action dismissed. It is so ordered.


Summaries of

State v. Hill

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three
Nov 30, 1970
477 P.2d 29 (Wash. Ct. App. 1970)
Case details for

State v. Hill

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. JAMES HILL, Appellant

Court:The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three

Date published: Nov 30, 1970

Citations

477 P.2d 29 (Wash. Ct. App. 1970)
477 P.2d 29
3 Wash. App. 715

Citing Cases

State v. Hill

Two issues emerge, i.e., was the trial court's ruling erroneous and, if so, was it prejudicial? State v.…