following Knight and holding that where conduct for which the driver was stopped was not prohibited by the statute cited for the stop, the officer did not have reasonable suspicion for the stop
Summary of this case from State v. RossNo. 95,708.
July 14, 2006.
Appeal from the Lyon.
Unpublished Opinions Affirmed.
following Knight and holding that where conduct for which the driver was stopped was not prohibited by the statute cited for the stop, the officer did not have reasonable suspicion for the stop
Summary of this case from State v. RossFull title:State v. Henning
Court:Court of Appeals of Kansas
Date published: Jul 14, 2006
33 Kan.App.2d at 327. Because the traffic stop was determined to be invalid, this court concluded that the…