From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Henes

Supreme Court of North Dakota
Apr 2, 2009
2009 N.D. 42 (N.D. 2009)

Summary

holding this Court will only vacate a sentence when the trial court acted outside the limits prescribed by statute or substantially relied on an impermissible factor in determining the severity of the sentence

Summary of this case from State v. Gonzalez

Opinion

No. 20080166.

April 2, 2009.

Appeal from the District Court, Bottineau County, Northeast Judicial District, Michael G. Sturdevant, J.

Jonathan R. Byers, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Attorney General, Bismarck, N.D., for plaintiff and appellee.

Chad R. McCabe of the McCabe Law Firm, Bismarck, N.D., for defendant and appellant.


Summaries of

State v. Henes

Supreme Court of North Dakota
Apr 2, 2009
2009 N.D. 42 (N.D. 2009)

holding this Court will only vacate a sentence when the trial court acted outside the limits prescribed by statute or substantially relied on an impermissible factor in determining the severity of the sentence

Summary of this case from State v. Gonzalez
Case details for

State v. Henes

Case Details

Full title:STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Jesse Dean HENES…

Court:Supreme Court of North Dakota

Date published: Apr 2, 2009

Citations

2009 N.D. 42 (N.D. 2009)
2009 N.D. 42

Citing Cases

State v. Aune

In Evanson, this Court reiterated that when a defendant does not object at sentencing to the introduction of…

State v. Evanson

"A district court enhances a sentence when it increases a defendant's sentence beyond the statutory maximum…