From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hemion

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 13, 2007
37 A.D.3d 616 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2006-03752.

February 13, 2007.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered April 11, 2006, convicting him of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Francis D. Phillips II, District Attorney, Goshen, N.Y. (David R. Huey of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Rivera, J.P., Spolzino, Fisher, Lifson and Dickerson, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the plea was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary is unpreserved for appellate review since he did not move to withdraw his plea on this ground ( see People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636, 637; People v Velazquez, 21 AD3d 388).

The defendant's valid and unrestricted written waiver of the right to appeal, as part of his plea agreement, precludes appellate review of his claim that the sentence imposed was excessive ( see People v Ramos, 21 AD3d 1125, affd 7 NY3d 737; cf. People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 9).


Summaries of

State v. Hemion

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 13, 2007
37 A.D.3d 616 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

State v. Hemion

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DENNIS HEMION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 13, 2007

Citations

37 A.D.3d 616 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 1317
828 N.Y.S.2d 815

Citing Cases

People v. Sulaiman

The record as a whole reveals that the defendant received meaningful representation (see People v Jermain, 56…

People v. Coleman

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant's contention that his plea of guilty was not knowingly,…