From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Helenbolt

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Jul 16, 1979
280 N.W.2d 631 (Minn. 1979)

Opinion

No. 49956.

June 7, 1979. Rehearing Denied July 16, 1979.

Appeal from the District Court, St. Louis County, Donald C. Odden, J.

Warren Spannaus, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Alan L. Mitchell, County Atty., by Michael W. McNabb, Asst. County Atty., Duluth, for appellant.

C. Paul Jones, Public Defender, by Mollie G. Raskind, Asst. Public Defender, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.


This is a pretrial appeal by the state pursuant to Rule 29.03, subd. 1, Rules of Criminal Procedure, from an order of the district court denying a motion by the state to compel testimony by defendant's alleged accomplice at defendant's trial without granting the accomplice immunity from prosecution. The defendant, in a motion to dismiss, argues that the state has failed to demonstrate clearly and unequivocally that the trial court erred in its decision and that the court's ruling will have a critical impact on the outcome of the trial. Although we deny the motion to dismiss, we agree that the state has not met its burden of demonstrating error, and accordingly we affirm. See, State v. Webber, 262 N.W.2d 157 (Minn. 1977).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Helenbolt

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Jul 16, 1979
280 N.W.2d 631 (Minn. 1979)
Case details for

State v. Helenbolt

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Minnesota, Appellant, v. William HELENBOLT, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Jul 16, 1979

Citations

280 N.W.2d 631 (Minn. 1979)

Citing Cases

State v. Schmieg

State v. Fisher, 304 N.W.2d 33 (Minn. 1981); State v. Helenbolt, 280 N.W.2d 631 (Minn. 1979), cert. denied,…

State v. Pelovsky

1981); State v. Vangstad, 289 N.W.2d 468 (Minn. 1979); State v. Helenbolt, 280 N.W.2d 631 (Minn. 1979), cert.…