Summary
In Hartzell, the court rejected the defendant's contention that the information must cite the firearm enhancement statute to give constitutionally-sufficient notice of the State's intent to seek that enhancement.
Summary of this case from In re BenavidezOpinion
No. 63816-5-I.
November 16, 2009.
The opinion in the above captioned case, which appeared in the advance sheets at 153 Wn. App. 137-76, has not been published in this permanent bound volume pursuant to an order of the Court of Appeals dated July 19, 2010 withdrawing the opinion and substituting a new opinion. See 156 Wn. App. 918.