Summary
In Watson, the plaintiff sued Allstate asserting claims for unfair settlement practices and specifically complained Allstate had failed to promptly settle her third-party claim against its insured.
Summary of this case from Letot v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'nOpinion
Nos. 61535, 63172.
November 9, 1993. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied December 16, 1993.
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, CITY OF ST. LOUIS; JOHN A. MOODY AND FLOYD McBRIDE, JUDGES.
Michael J. Mettes, Clayton, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Stacy L. Anderson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
ORDER
Defendant appeals his convictions for kidnapping and armed criminal action and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm pursuant to Rule 30.25(b) and Rule 84.16(b).
We further find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion in Defendant's direct appeal. Rule 30.25(b). Nor would an opinion in Defendant's appeal of his rule 29.15 motion have precedential value. Rule 84.16(b). Therefore, we affirm by order. We have provided the parties with a memorandum for their use only.