From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Gupta

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Mar 6, 2008
944 A.2d 980 (Conn. 2008)

Opinion

Decided March 6, 2008


The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 105 Conn. App. 237 (AC 27043), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in consolidating the three cases against the defendant?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court improperly failed to admit certain medical treatises and videotapes?

"3. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant's conviction for the sexual assault of M required reversal even though it was the `most brutal and shocking' of the three assaults that were consolidated for trial?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18122.

Michele C. Lukban, senior assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.
Hugh F. Keefe, in opposition.

SCHALLER, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


Summaries of

State v. Gupta

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Mar 6, 2008
944 A.2d 980 (Conn. 2008)
Case details for

State v. Gupta

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. SUSHIL GUPTA

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Mar 6, 2008

Citations

944 A.2d 980 (Conn. 2008)
286 Conn. 907

Citing Cases

State v. Gupta

"; (2) "Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court improperly failed to admit certain…