From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Groff

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 28, 1982
409 So. 2d 44 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Summary

discussing whether psychiatrist was a mandatory reporter under Florida statute

Summary of this case from Minch v. Ariz. State Bd. of Nursing

Opinion

No. 81-682.

December 16, 1981. Rehearing Denied January 28, 1982.

Petition for review from the Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Harry Lee Coe, III, J.

E.J. Salcines, State Atty., and David P. Rankin, Asst. State Atty., Tampa, and Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and James S. Purdy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellant.

Charles P. Schropp and Raymond T. Elligett, Jr., of Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings Evans, P.A., Tampa, for appellee.


The State of Florida appeals an order granting appellee Dr. Stephen Groff's motion to dismiss the second amended information. We affirm.

Dr. Groff is a psychiatrist. In that capacity, he treated one George Hoover but did not treat Hoover's daughter. The state alleged in its information that Dr. Groff had reason to believe that George Hoover was abusing his daughter and that Dr. Groff did not report the abuse nor cause reports to be filed with the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services.

Dr. Groff was charged pursuant to section 827.07(4), Florida Statutes (1975), which provides:

Any person, including, but not limited to, any physician, nurse, teacher, social worker, or employee of a public or private facility serving children, who has reason to believe that a child has been subject to abuse shall report or cause reports to be made to the department.

We are of the opinion that the phrase "any person" is qualified by the phrase "serving children." Thus, the phrase "any person" includes all those who serve children and is not limited to physicians, nurses, teachers, social workers or employees of public or private facilities.

Dr. Groff was not treating George Hoover's daughter and, in fact, the record shows he had never met the daughter. He does not, therefore, fall under the mandatory provision of section 827.07(4), Florida Statutes (1975), which requires the "serving of children." The information against him was properly dismissed.

AFFIRMED.

HOBSON, A.C.J., and OTT and RYDER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Groff

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 28, 1982
409 So. 2d 44 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

discussing whether psychiatrist was a mandatory reporter under Florida statute

Summary of this case from Minch v. Ariz. State Bd. of Nursing
Case details for

State v. Groff

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT, v. STEPHEN GROFF, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jan 28, 1982

Citations

409 So. 2d 44 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

Minch v. Ariz. State Bd. of Nursing

Similarly, the out-of-state cases she cites are distinguishable. See David N. v. St. Mary's Cty. Dep't of…

Leet v. State

It has been construed to be subject to some limitations, but not in the context of the facts of this case.…