From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Green

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1892
111 N.C. 646 (N.C. 1892)

Summary

holding that when the owner or tenant in possession of land forbids entry, any person with notice is liable to punishment for subsequent entry upon the land, regardless of his intent in making the entry

Summary of this case from State v. Glenn

Opinion

(September Term, 1892.)

INDICTMENT for an assault with intent to commit rape, tried at Spring Term, 1892, of CRAVEN, before Winston, J.

The Attorney-General for the State.

No counsel for defendant.


The statement of the case is as follows: . . . . "The jury rendered a verdict of guilty, and thereupon the court proceeded to judgment, to wit, that the defendant be confined in the State penitentiary for a term of fifteen years at hard labor. From this judgment the defendant appealed, and it was allowed him, upon filing an affidavit according to law as made and provided in such cases, to appeal in forma pauperis."

Since the adjournment of the court, the said appeal has not been perfected.


It appears from the statement of the judge below, that no exception was taken to the ruling of the court and no error assigned. Where no grounds for an appeal are set forth, the judgment must be affirmed if the record is perfect. We find no error in the record, and the judgment must be affirmed. S. v. Foster, 110 N.C. 510.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

State v. Green

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1892
111 N.C. 646 (N.C. 1892)

holding that when the owner or tenant in possession of land forbids entry, any person with notice is liable to punishment for subsequent entry upon the land, regardless of his intent in making the entry

Summary of this case from State v. Glenn
Case details for

State v. Green

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. JOHN GREEN

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Sep 1, 1892

Citations

111 N.C. 646 (N.C. 1892)
15 S.E. 888

Citing Cases

State v. Kerr

State v. Brooks, 507 S.W.2d 375, 376 (Mo. 1974). See also State v. Green, 111 Mo. 585, 20 S.W. 304 (1892);…

State v. Glenn

Upon our review of the record, we find Glenn was not in a place where he had a right to be because his status…