From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Gosnell

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Apr 10, 1974
204 S.E.2d 391 (S.C. 1974)

Opinion

19806

April 10, 1974.

Grover S. Parnell, Jr., Esq., of Greenville, for Appellant. Messrs. Daniel R. McLeod, Atty. Gen., Robert M. Ariail and Joseph R. Barker, Asst. Attys. Gen., of Columbia, C. Victor Pyle, Sol. and William W. Wilkins, Asst. Sol., of Greenville, for Respondent.


April 10, 1974.


This appeal from appellant's conviction of the offense of discharging a firearm into a dwelling in violation of Section 16-142, Code of 1962, is upon a single exception, i. e., "That the trial judge abused his discretion in refusing trial counsel's motion for continuance." The oral motion was made upon the ground of the absence of a witness. No attempt was made to comply with either the letter or spirit of Rule 27 of the Rules of the Circuit Court. Manifestly, since no showing was made which would have justified the exercise of the trial judge's discretion in favor of granting the motion, no abuse of discretion in its refusal appears.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Gosnell

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Apr 10, 1974
204 S.E.2d 391 (S.C. 1974)
Case details for

State v. Gosnell

Case Details

Full title:The STATE, Respondent, v. Milford Donald GOSNELL, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Apr 10, 1974

Citations

204 S.E.2d 391 (S.C. 1974)
204 S.E.2d 391

Citing Cases

State v. Fuller

of the 1962 South Carolina Code of Laws. As to the trial Judge's having erredin charging the jury that,…

State v. Bailey

Absent an abuse of discretion, the decision of the trial court will be upheld. State v. Gosnell, 262 S.C.…