From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Gomes

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 27, 2019
334 Conn. 902 (Conn. 2019)

Opinion

11-27-2019

STATE of Connecticut v. Wagner GOMES

Lisa J. Steele, assigned counsel, in support of the petition. Timothy J. Sugrue, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Lisa J. Steele, assigned counsel, in support of the petition.

Timothy J. Sugrue, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 193 Conn. App. 79, 218 A.3d 1063 (2019), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court's ‘investigative inadequacy’ jury instruction did not mislead the jury or otherwise prejudice the defendant?

"2. Should this court overrule or limit its decisions in State v. Williams, 169 Conn. 322, 363 A.2d 72 (1975), and State v. Collins, 299 Conn. 567, 10 A.3d 1005, cert. denied, 565 U.S. 908, 132 S. Ct. 314, 181 L. Ed. 2d 193 (2011), as they relate to the ‘investigative inadequacy’ jury instruction, and invoke its supervisory authority to prescribe an investigative inadequacy instruction as proposed by the defendant?"


Summaries of

State v. Gomes

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 27, 2019
334 Conn. 902 (Conn. 2019)
Case details for

State v. Gomes

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. Wagner GOMES

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Nov 27, 2019

Citations

334 Conn. 902 (Conn. 2019)
219 A.3d 798

Citing Cases

State v. Petersen

Although the model jury instructions are ‘‘not dispositive of the adequacy of the [jury] instruction, an…

State v. Gomes

And (2) "[s]hould this court overrule or limit its decisions in State v. Williams , 169 Conn. 322, 363 A.2d…