From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Golden

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Penobscot
Mar 2, 1929
145 A. 11 (Me. 1929)

Opinion

Opinion March 2, 1929.

CRIMINAL LAW. MOTION IN ARREST OF JUDGMENT. APPEAL TO LAW COURT, WHEN PROVIDED.

A motion in arrest of judgment is not concerned with testimony. It cannot reach matters of evidence. The remedy of a respondent found guilty by a jury upon insufficient evidence is a motion to have the verdict set aside and a new trial granted. This motion is addressed to the sitting justice whose decision in case of misdemeanors is final. Only in prosecutions for felony is an appeal to the Law Court provided.

Appeal by Frank Golden respondent based upon motion in arrest of judgment and exceptions. Respondent was charged with having in his possession intoxicating liquors unlawfully with intent to sell the same. The jury returned a verdict of guilty, whereupon respondent filed a motion in arrest of judgment which was overruled and exceptions filed and allowed. Exceptions overruled. Judgment for the State. The case sufficiently appears in the opinion.

George F. Eaton, County Attorney for the State.

George E. Thompson, Benjamin W. Blanchard, for respondent.

SITTING: WILSON, C. J., DEASY, STURGIS, BARNES, BASSETT, JJ., PHILBROOK, A. R. J.


The respondent, charged with a misdemeanor, was found guilty by a jury. He filed a motion in arrest of judgment on the alleged ground that the complaint is "not sufficient in law." The motion was overruled and exceptions saved.

The complaint seems to be in due form and the respondent points to no fault in it.

The real ground of the motion seems to be (quoting the brief) "that an examination of the testimony . . . will disclose that no crime has been committed."

But a motion in arrest of judgment is not concerned with testimony. "It cannot reach matters of evidence." State v. Howard, 117 Me. 69; State v. Snow, 74 Me. 354; State v. Gerrish, 78 Me. 20; 12 Cyc., 759. It is sometimes said that a motion in arrest of judgment "reaches the whole record." But the "record" as the term is thus used "does not include or mean the evidence in the case." State v. Howard, supra, at 71.

The remedy of a respondent found guilty, by a jury, upon insufficient evidence, is a motion to have the verdict set aside and a new trial granted. This motion must be addressed to the sitting justice whose decision in case of misdemeanors is final. Only in prosecutions for felony is an appeal to the Law Court provided. R. S., Chap. 136, Sec. 28.

Exceptions overruled. Judgment for the State.


Summaries of

State v. Golden

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Penobscot
Mar 2, 1929
145 A. 11 (Me. 1929)
Case details for

State v. Golden

Case Details

Full title:STATE vs. FRANK GOLDEN

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Penobscot

Date published: Mar 2, 1929

Citations

145 A. 11 (Me. 1929)
145 A. 11

Citing Cases

State v. Howe

" A motion in arrest of judgment can reach only defects in the record, State v. Kopelow, 126 Me. 384, 388,…