From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Gibson

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jun 30, 1969
254 Md. 399 (Md. 1969)

Summary

In State v. Gibson, 254 Md. 399, 401, 254 A.2d 691, 692 (1969), we expressly approved this holding and reasoning of the Court of Special Appeals.

Summary of this case from Harris v. State

Opinion

[No. 321, September Term, 1968.]

Decided June 30, 1969.

MANSLAUGHTER — By Automobile — Manslaughter By Automobile Statute, Code (1967 Repl. Vol.) Article 27, § 388, Intended To Encompass Entire Field Of Unintentional Criminal Homicides Resulting From Operation Of A Motor Vehicle — Counts Of Indictment Charging Involuntary Manslaughter By Automobile Solely By Reason Of A Violation Of Law Without Alleging Gross Negligence Properly Dismissed. p. 401

Certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.

Petition of the State for writ of certiorari granted where the Court of Special Appeals affirmed the granting of a motion to dismiss the first four counts of a five count indictment against Michael Dana Gibson for causing the death of Diana Grempler by the unlawful operation of a motor vehicle.

Judgment affirmed, costs to be paid by Baltimore County.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and MARBURY, BARNES, FINAN and SMITH, JJ.

L. Robert Evans, Deputy State's Attorney for Baltimore County, with whom were Francis B. Burch, Attorney General, Robert A. DiCicco, Assistant Attorney General, and Samuel A. Green, Jr., State's Attorney for Baltimore County, on the brief, for appellant.

Donald J. Gilmore, with whom was Richard D. Byrd on the brief, for appellee.


The State indicted Michael Dana Gibson in five counts for causing the death of Diana Grempler by the unlawful operation of a motor vehicle. The State's attorney for Baltimore County seemingly feared he could not prove gross negligence for in the first four counts he sought to charge involuntary manslaughter by automobile solely by reason of a violation of law without alleging gross negligence. The first count charged that the death resulted from Gibson's failure to stop in obedience to a stop sign, the second that it resulted from his reckless driving, the third as a result of his driving under the influence of alcohol, and the fourth as a direct result of Gibson's possession, he being under twenty-one, of an alcoholic beverage on a public highway. Each count concluded with the words "(Common Law — Misdemeanor Manslaughter)." The fifth count was brought under Code (1967 Repl. Vol.), Art. 27, § 388, for that Gibson, while operating an automobile unlawfully "in a grossly negligent" manner, did kill Miss Grempler.

Judge Menchine, in granting a motion to dismiss the first four counts, rejected the State's contention that if an unlawful act, regardless of its nature or character, causes death, the perpetrator is guilty of involuntary manslaughter and held that none of those counts legally charged a crime. The Court of Special Appeals affirmed on the ground that the legislature in enacting Ch. 414 of the Laws of 1941, Code (1967 Repl. Vol.), Art. 27, § 388, entitled "Manslaughter by Automobile * * *," intended to encompass the entire field of unintentional criminal homicides resulting from the operation of a motor vehicle so that the common law crime of involuntary manslaughter (whatever are its scope and limits) when based on occurrences of that type is controlled and governed exclusively by the statute. Since the matter was of public importance in the administration of the criminal law, we granted certiorari.

We have carefully reviewed and considered the record and the law and have concluded that the result reached by the Court of Special Appeals was correct for the reasons given in the careful and thorough opinion of Chief Judge Murphy of the Court, in State v. Gibson, 4 Md. App. 236, which we approve.

Judgment affirmed, costs to be paid by Baltimore County.


Summaries of

State v. Gibson

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jun 30, 1969
254 Md. 399 (Md. 1969)

In State v. Gibson, 254 Md. 399, 401, 254 A.2d 691, 692 (1969), we expressly approved this holding and reasoning of the Court of Special Appeals.

Summary of this case from Harris v. State

In Gibson, the defendant was facing a ten-year maximum imprisonment penalty under common law involuntary manslaughter, whereas the maximum penalty under the statute was limited to three years.

Summary of this case from State v. North

noting that Gregg does not preclude an appeal from less than all counts of an indictment when the remaining counts are terminated by entry of a nolle prosequi

Summary of this case from Jones v. State
Case details for

State v. Gibson

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MARYLAND v . GIBSON

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Jun 30, 1969

Citations

254 Md. 399 (Md. 1969)
254 A.2d 691

Citing Cases

State v. North

The Fiscal Note prepared for the bill by the Legislature's Department of Fiscal Services supports that…

Forbes v. State

This case presents the question of whether one who unintentionally causes a death as a result of the grossly…