From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Gibbs

Oregon Court of Appeals
Apr 28, 2004
193 Or. App. 296 (Or. Ct. App. 2004)

Summary

reversing after the giving of a Miles instruction where the record did not include any evidence that the defendant's severe head trauma made him more susceptible to the influence of alcohol

Summary of this case from State v. Avila

Opinion

010545693; A118270.

Argued and submitted March 30, 2004.

Filed: April 28, 2004.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County. Clifford L. Freeman, Judge.

Jamesa J. Drake, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief was Peter A. Ozanne, Executive Director, Office of Public Defense Services.

David John Amesbury, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and LANDAU and SCHUMAN, Judges.


PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.


Defendant appeals his conviction for Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants, ORS 813.010(1). His defense at trial was that he had previously suffered a severe head trauma and that the apparent symptoms of intoxication that the officer observed were in fact the result of that injury. Over his objection, the trial court gave Uniform Criminal Jury Instruction 2076, which informs the jury that a defendant whose physical condition makes the defendant more susceptible to the influence of alcohol than the defendant would otherwise be is nevertheless under the influence of intoxicants. See State v. Miles, 8 Or. App. 189, 492 P.2d 497, rev den, (1972).

We have held that there must be evidence that the defendant's condition made him more susceptible to the influence of alcohol before a trial court may give a Miles instruction. State v. Huck, 100 Or. App. 193, 197, 785 P.2d 785 (1990). There is no such evidence in this case. Giving a Miles instruction in the absence of that evidence is reversible error. See State v. Curtis, 182 Or. App. 166, 169, 47 P.3d 929, rev den, 335 Or. 104 (2002). The state concedes that the trial court erred, and we agree.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.


Summaries of

State v. Gibbs

Oregon Court of Appeals
Apr 28, 2004
193 Or. App. 296 (Or. Ct. App. 2004)

reversing after the giving of a Miles instruction where the record did not include any evidence that the defendant's severe head trauma made him more susceptible to the influence of alcohol

Summary of this case from State v. Avila
Case details for

State v. Gibbs

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. LORIKKO IZELL BURKETT GIBBS, aka Lorikko…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Apr 28, 2004

Citations

193 Or. App. 296 (Or. Ct. App. 2004)
89 P.3d 1215

Citing Cases

State v. Rich

We have held that “there must be evidence that the defendant's condition made him more susceptible to the…

State v. Massey

This court has repeatedly held that, in order for that instruction to be proper, “there must be evidence that…