From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Gardner

Oregon Court of Appeals
Oct 2, 1970
475 P.2d 92 (Or. Ct. App. 1970)

Opinion

Argued September 28, 1970

Affirmed October 2, 1970

Appeal from Circuit Court, Douglas County.

DOUGLAS R. SPENCER, Judge.

Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Jacob B. Tanzer, Solicitor General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Lee Johnson, Attorney General, Salem.

Before SCHWAB, Chief Judge, and LANGTRY and BRANCHFIELD, Judges.


AFFIRMED.


This is an appeal from a plea of guilty. Having originally plead not guilty, defendant went to trial before a jury on a charge of burglary not in a dwelling. He was represented by counsel. After hearing the evidence against him he withdrew his plea of not guilty and entered a plea of guilty. He now argues that the court should not have permitted him to so do.

On appeal from a judgment entered on a plea of guilty:

"* * * [T]he appellate court shall only consider the question whether an excessive fine or excessive, cruel or unusual punishment not proportionate to the offense has been imposed * * *." ORS 138.050.

See State v. Brudos, 3 Or. App. 239, 471 P.2d 861 Sup Ct review denied (1970).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Gardner

Oregon Court of Appeals
Oct 2, 1970
475 P.2d 92 (Or. Ct. App. 1970)
Case details for

State v. Gardner

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DONNIE RAY GARDNER, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 2, 1970

Citations

475 P.2d 92 (Or. Ct. App. 1970)
475 P.2d 92

Citing Cases

State v. Van Valkenberg

In a number of recent cases we have pointed out that ORS 138.050 limits the scope of direct appeals from a…

State v. Slopak

On several occasions, the latest being today, see State v. Wickenheiser, 3 Or. App. 509, 475 P.2d 422 (1970),…