From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Friedrich Loots Co.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin
Jul 3, 1953
59 N.W.2d 803 (Wis. 1953)

Opinion

June 6, 1953 —

July 3, 1953.

ERROR to review a judgment of the municipal court of Winnebago county: SAM J. LUCHSINGER, Judge. Reversed.

For the plaintiff in error there were briefs by the Attorney General, and Stewart G. Honeck, deputy attorney general, and William A. Platz, assistant attorney general, and oral argument by Mr. Honeck and Mr. Platz.


The facts are similar to those in State v. Stang Tank Line (1953), ante, p. 570, 59 N.W.2d 800, decided this day. Defendant's truck was overloaded to an extent for which sec. 85.91(2b)(b), Stats., provided fines and penalties of $1,319. In its judgment the trial court imposed fines of $449.85, including costs, and "remitted" $875 poundage penalties.


The case is ruled by State v. Stang Tank Line, supra. Remission of all or part of a statutory penalty is beyond the trial court's discretion where no such power has been given it by the legislature. It is immaterial whether the court "remits" or "suspends" the penalty; the sentence is not authorized by law and is void.

By the Court. — Judgment reversed, and cause remanded with instructions to the trial court to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendant for the penalty provided by sec. 85.91(2b)(b), Stats., conformably to this opinion and for further proceedings according to law.


Summaries of

State v. Friedrich Loots Co.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin
Jul 3, 1953
59 N.W.2d 803 (Wis. 1953)
Case details for

State v. Friedrich Loots Co.

Case Details

Full title:STATE, Plaintiff in error, vs. FRIEDRICH LOOTS COMPANY, Defendant in error

Court:Supreme Court of Wisconsin

Date published: Jul 3, 1953

Citations

59 N.W.2d 803 (Wis. 1953)
59 N.W.2d 803

Citing Cases

State v. Seraphine

" Although constitutional questions were not raised, this court passed upon penalties in several cases for…