From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Francis

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 9, 2014
89 A.3d 349 (Conn. 2014)

Opinion

2014-04-9

STATE of Connecticut v. Maurice FRANCIS.

John L. Cordani, Jr., assigned counsel, in support of the petition. Kathryn W. Bare, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


John L. Cordani, Jr., assigned counsel, in support of the petition. Kathryn W. Bare, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 148 Conn.App. 788, 86 A.3d 1074, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant waived his right to counsel when he elected to testify at trial?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it dismissed a juror and, if not, did the trial court's improper dismissal of a juror constitute reversible error?”


Summaries of

State v. Francis

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 9, 2014
89 A.3d 349 (Conn. 2014)
Case details for

State v. Francis

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. Maurice FRANCIS.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Apr 9, 2014

Citations

89 A.3d 349 (Conn. 2014)
311 Conn. 940

Citing Cases

State v. Francis

”; and “2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when…

State v. Francis

"; and "2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when…