From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Fowler

Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District, Waco
Jan 8, 2003
97 S.W.3d 721 (Tex. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. 10-02-273-CR.

Opinion delivered and filed January 8, 2003.

Appeal from the 1st District Court, Newton County, Texas, Trial Court #5269-1, Joe Bob Golden, Jr., J.

Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

A.W. Davis, Jr., Newton, for appellant.

William S. Morian, Jr., Seale, Stover, Bisbey Morian, Jasper, for appellee.

Before Chief Justice DAVIS, Justice VANCE, and Justice GRAY.


OPINION


Racheal Fowler filed an application for writ of habeas corpus in the district court contending that her arrest warrant was not supported by probable cause. The court issued the writ and set the matter for hearing. After hearing, the court held that the warrant was not supported by probable cause and ordered Fowler discharged and released from her surety bond. The State appealed.

Generally, the State cannot appeal an adverse ruling in a habeas proceeding. State ex rel. Holmes v. Klevenhagen, 819 S.W.2d 539, 541 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991) (orig. proceeding). The State may appeal an adverse habeas ruling if a statute provides for such an appeal. E.g., State v. Young, 810 S.W.2d 221, 223 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991) (habeas orders effectively setting aside indictments); State v. Kanapa, 778 S.W.2d 592, 593 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1989, no pet.) (habeas order modifying judgment).

Article 44.01 of the Code of Criminal Procedure permits the State to appeal (among other things) an order dismissing an indictment or an order modifying a judgment. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 44.01(a)(1), (2) (Vernon Supp. 2003).

The State may bring an interlocutory appeal from an adverse probable cause determination only when that decision is made in an order granting a motion to suppress evidence. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 44.01(a)(5) (Vernon Supp. 2003). No other statute provides a basis for this appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss the State's appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Justice GRAY concurring.


Everything in the majority opinion is dicta. The State withdrew its notice of appeal before we issued an opinion in the case. We therefore have no appeal in which to form and express any opinion. Because the notice of appeal has been withdrawn, we may dismiss the appeal. Tex.R.App.P. 42.2(a). I concur only in the judgment of dismissal.


Summaries of

State v. Fowler

Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District, Waco
Jan 8, 2003
97 S.W.3d 721 (Tex. App. 2003)
Case details for

State v. Fowler

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant, v. RACHEAL FOWLER, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District, Waco

Date published: Jan 8, 2003

Citations

97 S.W.3d 721 (Tex. App. 2003)

Citing Cases

Villanueva v. State

ed) (Gray, C.J., concurring); Wachovia Bank of Del, N.A. v. Gilliam, No. 10-04-00038-CV, 2005 WL 1531293, *4,…

State v. Reyes

Ordinarily, a respondent in a habeas corpus case may not appeal from an adverse ruling. State ex rel. Holmes…