Summary
In State v. Foutch, 196 Neb. 644, 244 N.W.2d 291 (1976), the court reduced defendant's sentence of 3 to 9 years' imprisonment for assault with intent to inflict great bodily injury on a 4-year-old child to 1 to 3 years.
Summary of this case from State v. HaynieOpinion
No. 40500.
Filed July 28, 1976.
1. Criminal Law: Sentences. A sentence of imprisonment should not exceed the minimum period consistent with protection of the public, gravity of the offense, and rehabilitative needs of the defendant. 2. ___: ___. Section 29-2308, R.R.S. 1943, gives this court the authority to reduce a sentence rendered by the District Court when it appears to be excessive. 3. ___: ___. The punishment for a criminal act should in all circumstances be commensurate with the offense.
Appeal from the District Court for Douglas County: SAMUEL P. CANIGLIA, Judge. Affirmed as modified.
Paul L. Douglas, Attorney General, and Melvin K. Kammerlohr, for appellee.
Paul E. Watts, J. Joseph McQuillan, Gerald E. Moran, and Robert C. Sigler, for appellant.
Heard before WHITE, C.J., SPENCER, BOSLAUGH, McCOWN, NEWTON, CLINTON, and BRODKEY, JJ.
Defendant, James Michael Foutch, pled guilty to a charge of assault with intent to inflict great bodily injury on a 4-year-old child. He appeals as excessive and unduly harsh a 3 to 9 year sentence in the Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex. We affirm as modified.
The charge stems from an incident in which Foutch kicked a child when the child refused to obey him. The kick either knocked the child into a window fan sitting on the floor, or the child fell against a chair on which the fan was resting, causing it to fall on him, injuring his left leg. The child was unable to stand up and defendant packed his leg in ice. Defendant had been babysitting with the child while his mother was shopping. When the mother returned, she and defendant took the boy to the hospital where X-rays revealed the fractured leg.
Defendant, who had been dating the child's mother for about 1 year before the incident, had developed a rapport with the child. During that period he had taken the child and a sister to various places of amusement. As described by the mother, he had become a surrogate father to the child.
The penalty provided for this offense is imprisonment in the Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex for not less than 1 year nor more than 20 years. 28-413, R. S. Supp., 1974. The penalty imposed is well within the range of the statute. The question is whether it is excessive on the facts in this case.
Defendant, who is 26 years of age, was single and had no previous criminal record, either misdemeanor or felony. He was cooperative and readily admitted his guilt. In a moment of anger, he gave vent to an emotional outburst which resulted in the injury.
On the motion for a new trial the mother of the boy testified that the defendant and her son had always gotten along well. She confirmed the fact that the defendant had been a father figure toward the child and had taken him to various places of amusement. The boy's leg had completely healed by that time.
At the oral argument, the State's attorney commented that he felt the sentence in this case was difficult to defend, but since defendant had pled guilty to the charge of assault with intent to do great bodily injury, the sentence could not be said to be an abuse of discretion. On the record, we feel, however, it is excessive under the circumstances.
A sentence of imprisonment should not exceed the minimum period consistent with protection of the public, gravity of the offense, and rehabilitative needs of the defendant. State v. Sturm (1972), 189 Neb. 299, 202 N.W.2d 381.
Defendant, who was a sober, industrious individual, was self-employed as a supervisor of a maintenance crew at an Omaha condominium. He quit school in the 10th grade to enlist in the army. He served in Vietnam and was honorably discharged in October 1969. He lived at home with his father. The child's mother professes to be in love with him. He visited the child in the hospital and appears to be very concerned about the unfortunate incident.
Section 29-2308, R.R.S. 1943, gives this court the authority to reduce a sentence rendered by the District Court when it appears to be excessive. Under the circumstances of this case, probation cannot be justified because of the seriousness of the offense, which was after all a crime of violence directed toward a child. A reduction in sentence, however, is appropriate given the defendant's lack of any prior record, the absence of any showing that defendant himself represents a threat to the public, and his cooperation. The punishment for a criminal act should in all circumstances be commensurate with the offense. State v. Williams (1974), 191 Neb. 57, 213 N.W.2d 727.
On the record, the interest of justice would be better served by a sentence of 1 to 3 years in the Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex. We therefore reduce the sentence imposed to 1 to 3 years, and affirm the judgment as modified.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.