From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Eubanks

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
May 29, 2014
851 N.W.2d 854 (Iowa Ct. App. 2014)

Summary

holding there was substantial evidence controlled substances were in defendant's possession

Summary of this case from State v. Benton

Opinion

No. 13–0602.

2014-05-29

STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Mark EUBANKS, Defendant–Appellant.

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Scott D. Rosenberg, Judge. Defendant appeals his convictions for possession of a controlled substance and interference with official acts causing injury. AFFIRMED. Magdalena B. Reese and Robb Goedicke of Cooper, Goedicke, Reimer & Reese, West Des Moines, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Kyle Hanson, Assistant Attorney General, John Sarcone, County Attorney, and Andrea Petrovich, Assistant County Attorney, for appellee.



Summaries of

State v. Eubanks

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
May 29, 2014
851 N.W.2d 854 (Iowa Ct. App. 2014)

holding there was substantial evidence controlled substances were in defendant's possession

Summary of this case from State v. Benton

noting "[t]he statute criminalizes ‘possession’ " and "the State can prove past possession, whether actual or constructive"

Summary of this case from State v. Jones
Case details for

State v. Eubanks

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Mark EUBANKS, Defendant–Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of Iowa.

Date published: May 29, 2014

Citations

851 N.W.2d 854 (Iowa Ct. App. 2014)

Citing Cases

State v. Steide

that night as he passed it to H.D.See State v. Jones, 967 N.W.2d 336, 341 (Iowa 2021) (clarifying that actual…

State v. Perry

"[T]here is no hard and fast distinction between actual possession and constructive possession; where the…