Opinion
Argued February 3, 1943 —
Decided April 29, 1943.
On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 129 N.J.L. 169.
For the defendant in error, Daniel T. O'Regan.
For the plaintiff in error, Harold Simandl.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, DEAR, WELLS, RAFFERTY, THOMPSON, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.