From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

STATE v. ELL

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Sep 10, 1991
813 S.W.2d 26 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

Nos. 56213, 58790.

May 28, 1991. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 23, 1991. Application to Transfer Denied September 10, 1991.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY; MELVYN W. WIESMAN, JUDGE.

William J. Swift, St. Louis, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Joan F. Gummels, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.


Defendant, Freddie Ell, appeals his conviction of failure to return rented property, § 578.150 RSMo 1986. On February 3, 1989, the trial court sentenced defendant as a prior and persistent offender to five years imprisonment.

In State v. Harrison, 805 S.W.2d 241 (Mo.App. 1991) (Supreme Court denied motion for transfer), we held, as a matter of first impression, that contracts which include provisions of "sale" in addition to terms of rental are not within the criminal protection of § 578.150 RSMo 1986.

The state charged defendant here with the failure to return property which was the subject of a rent-to-own contract between defendant and America's Rent to Own. We are unable to factually or legally distinguish the instant cause of action from Harrison. Following our decision in Harrison, we hold the trial court erred in failing to grant defendant's motion for acquittal at the close of all the evidence.

We reverse the judgment of conviction.

PUDLOWSKI, P.J., and SIMON, J., concur.


Summaries of

STATE v. ELL

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Sep 10, 1991
813 S.W.2d 26 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

STATE v. ELL

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT, v. FREDDIE D. ELL, APPELLANT. FREDDIE D…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Sep 10, 1991

Citations

813 S.W.2d 26 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

State v. Thorn

Defendant's second point avers the conviction should be reversed because Newport "had agreed to sell [the…

State v. Latham

{¶ 33} Lease-purchase agreements are regulated by R.C. Chapter 1351. R.C. 1351.03(B) provides that “no…