From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. E.G.

Supreme Court of Washington.
Jan 4, 2017
386 P.3d 1082 (Wash. 2017)

Opinion

No. 93609-9

01-04-2017

State of Washington, Respondent, v. E.G., Petitioner.


ORDER

¶1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices Johnson, Fairhurst, Wiggins, and Gordon McCloud, considered at its January 3, 2017, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶3 That the Petition for Review is granted. The motion to use initials for the Petitioner's name in the title of the case and in public documents is passed to the merits. The motion to seal the appellate court record is denied. Any party may serve and file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of this order, see RAP 13.7(d). The supplemental briefs should also address the issue whether initials should be used for the Petitioner's name.

For the Court

/s/ Madsen, C.J.

CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

State v. E.G.

Supreme Court of Washington.
Jan 4, 2017
386 P.3d 1082 (Wash. 2017)
Case details for

State v. E.G.

Case Details

Full title:State of Washington, Respondent, v. E.G., Petitioner.

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Jan 4, 2017

Citations

386 P.3d 1082 (Wash. 2017)
187 Wash. 2d 1001
187 Wn. 2d 1001