From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Druin

Court of Errors and Appeals
Mar 26, 1926
132 A. 924 (N.J. 1926)

Opinion

Submitted February 12, 1926 —

Decided March 26, 1926.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 3 N.J. Mis. R. 986.

For the defendant in error, J. Willard De Yoe.

For the plaintiff in error, Wood McKee and Weinberger Weinberger.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — TRENCHARD, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, CAMPBELL, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, HETFIELD, JJ. 9.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

State v. Druin

Court of Errors and Appeals
Mar 26, 1926
132 A. 924 (N.J. 1926)
Case details for

State v. Druin

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. MORRIS DRUIN, PLAINTIFF IN…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Mar 26, 1926

Citations

132 A. 924 (N.J. 1926)
132 A. 924

Citing Cases

State v. Tilghman

" Lynch, supra, 79 N.J. at 337, 399 A.2d 629; see also Pressler, Current N.J. Court Rules, comment 1 on R.…