From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Crespo

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Dec 4, 2013
81 A.3d 1181 (Conn. 2013)

Opinion

2013-12-4

STATE of Connecticut v. Victor CRESPO.

Martin Zeldis, public defender, and Megan L. Weiss, deputy assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Leonard C. Boyle, deputy chief state's attorney, in opposition.


Martin Zeldis, public defender, and Megan L. Weiss, deputy assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Leonard C. Boyle, deputy chief state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 145 Conn.App. 547, 76 A.3d 664, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that the defendant's written statement was properly admitted at trial?

“2. Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that, although the firearm was discovered in the defendant's car, the jury reasonably could have found that the defendant had carried the pistol in violation of General Statutes § 29–35?” ESPINOSA, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.


Summaries of

State v. Crespo

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Dec 4, 2013
81 A.3d 1181 (Conn. 2013)
Case details for

State v. Crespo

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. Victor CRESPO.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Dec 4, 2013

Citations

81 A.3d 1181 (Conn. 2013)
310 Conn. 953

Citing Cases

State v. Crespo

First, did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court properly rejected the defendant's…