From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Donoho

Supreme Court of Nebraska
Oct 5, 1973
190 Neb. 593 (Neb. 1973)

Opinion

No. 38952.

Filed October 5, 1973.

Criminal Law: Limitations of Actions: Time. The filing of a felony complaint before a magistrate charging embezzlement and the issuance of an arrest warrant within 3 years after the date of the offense tolls the statute of limitations. 29-110, R. S. Supp., 1972.

Appeal from the District Court for Cherry County: JOHN H. KUNS, Judge. Affirmed.

Charles A. Fisher, for appellant.

Clarence A. H. Meyer, Attorney General, and Melvin K. Kammerlohr, for appellee.

Heard before WHITE, C. J., SPENCER, BOSLAUGH, SMITH, McCOWN, NEWTON, and CLINTON, JJ.


The defendant was convicted of embezzling $7,895.12 while acting as guardian for Harold Leonard Grosse. The information which was filed April 28, 1969, alleged the embezzlement occurred between March 1, 1966, and October 17, 1967. The defendant contends the judgment should be reversed because the information charged an offense that occurred in part more than 3 years before the date on which it was filed.

Under section 29-110, R. S. Supp., 1972, as amended in 1965, filing of a felony complaint before a magistrate and the issuance of an arrest warrant within 3 years after the date of the offense tolls the statute of limitations. The record here shows the complaint was filed in the county court on or about February 20, 1969, and a warrant was issued on that date. This was sufficient to toll the statute, and the assignment of error is without merit.

The defendant also complains that one of the prosecutors in his closing argument referred to the fact that the defendant would "not have the right to get up and rebut what I am saying now." The remark had reference to the fact that the State was making the closing argument. It did not refer to the fact that the defendant, who had appeared pro se, had not testified.

The defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for 1 to 4 years. There is nothing in the record that indicates the sentence was excessive or an abuse of discretion by the trial court.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

State v. Donoho

Supreme Court of Nebraska
Oct 5, 1973
190 Neb. 593 (Neb. 1973)
Case details for

State v. Donoho

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLEE, v. DEAN L. DONOHO, APPELLANT

Court:Supreme Court of Nebraska

Date published: Oct 5, 1973

Citations

190 Neb. 593 (Neb. 1973)
210 N.W.2d 850

Citing Cases

State v. Padilla

Each of these cases involved an original and a superseding charging document without any lapse between the…

State v. Martinez

Upon the filing of the indictment prior to dismissal of the complaint, the indictment was timely because the…