From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. District Court

Supreme Court of Nevada
Jan 18, 1929
273 P. 661 (Nev. 1929)

Summary

In Roxana Petroleum Corp. v. Jarvis, 127 Kan. 365, 273 P. 661 (1929), this court construed deeds containing the expressions "less railroad right of way" and "excepting railroad right of way" and held the deeds conveyed the grantors' interest in the right-of-way tract and title vested in the owners of the tract at the time the right-of-way was abandoned.

Summary of this case from Gauger v. State

Opinion

No. 2855

January 18, 1929.

Cyrus A. Hovey, of Los Angeles, Calif., and Green Lunsford, of Reno, for Petitioner.

C.C. Ward, of Mina, and M.A. Diskin, Attorney-General, for Respondents.


OPINION


The facts in this matter are substantially the same as in the proceeding No. 2856, 273 P. 659, of the same title, this day decided, except that there has been no sale under the judgment rendered. Upon authority of the opinion in the matter mentioned, it is ordered that the so-called judgment complained of in this proceeding be and the same is hereby declared null and void and held for naught. Applicant to have judgment for its costs herein expended.


Summaries of

State v. District Court

Supreme Court of Nevada
Jan 18, 1929
273 P. 661 (Nev. 1929)

In Roxana Petroleum Corp. v. Jarvis, 127 Kan. 365, 273 P. 661 (1929), this court construed deeds containing the expressions "less railroad right of way" and "excepting railroad right of way" and held the deeds conveyed the grantors' interest in the right-of-way tract and title vested in the owners of the tract at the time the right-of-way was abandoned.

Summary of this case from Gauger v. State
Case details for

State v. District Court

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEVADA EX REL. NEVADA DOUGLASS GOLD MINES, INCORPORATED, v. THE…

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada

Date published: Jan 18, 1929

Citations

273 P. 661 (Nev. 1929)
273 P. 661

Citing Cases

University City v. Chicago, R.I. P. Ry. Co.

This can only be an easement. 3 Bouvier's Law Dictionary, p. 3444; 51 C.J., p. 539, sec. 203; State ex rel.…

Marland v. Gillespie

of the Tenth Circuit. It has been quoted with approval many times: See Herod v. Carter, 81 Kan. 236, 106 P.…