From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. DiCanio

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 17, 1927
138 A. 923 (N.J. 1927)

Opinion

Submitted May 27, 1927 —

Decided October 17, 1927.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 4 N.J. Mis. R. 395.

For the plaintiff in error, John C. Reed.

For the defendant in error, Louis A. Repetto, prosecutor of the pleas.


The defendant, Anthony DiCanio, was indicted jointly with John Letter, tried and convicted in the Atlantic Quarter Sessions, as charged in the indictment, for the crime of robbery, and sentenced. The judgment and conviction were reviewed by the Supreme Court on error, and the entire record of the proceedings had upon the trial were certified and returned. The conviction of Letter was reversed, and as to DiCanio was affirmed; whereupon the latter, DiCanio, sued out a writ of error from this court to review the judgment of the Supreme Court affirming his conviction.

The judgment against DiCanio will be affirmed, for the reasons given in the Supreme Court in the case of State v. Letter and DiCanio, 4 N.J. Mis. R. 395, as to the guilt of the defendant DiCanio.

For affirmance — TRENCHARD, PARKER, BLACK, KATZENBACH, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

State v. DiCanio

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 17, 1927
138 A. 923 (N.J. 1927)
Case details for

State v. DiCanio

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. ANTHONY DiCANIO, PLAINTIFF IN…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 17, 1927

Citations

138 A. 923 (N.J. 1927)
138 A. 923

Citing Cases

State v. Schmieder

This is so under the common law, the rules and the cases. State v. Lyons, 70 N.J.L. 635 ( E. A. 1904); State…

State v. Hale

In reaching this conclusion we have considered the weight of the evidence, as is proper in determining…