From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Desmond

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham
Aug 13, 1984
480 A.2d 208 (N.H. 1984)

Opinion

No. 83-504

Decided August 13, 1984

1. Appeal and Error — Preservation of Questions — Failure To Present Below The supreme court will not consider on appeal issues not raised by exception, objection or motion in the trial court.

2. Appeal and Error — Preservation of Questions — Failure To Present Below Failure of indictment to allege a culpable mental state could not be raised on appeal by defendant who pleaded guilty to the charge in the indictment, since the issue was not raised by exception, objection or motion in the trial court at the time of defendant's guilty plea.

Gregory H. Smith, attorney general (Robert B. Muh, attorney, on the brief and orally), for the State.

Cullity Kelley, of Manchester (John C. Boeckeler on the brief and orally), for the defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

In 1976 the defendant executed an acknowledgement-of-rights form and pleaded guilty to a charge of unlawful sale of a controlled drug. RSA 318-B:2 (Supp. 1981). The indictment charging the defendant did not allege a culpable mental state. The defendant was represented by counsel and no objection, exception, or motion to quash the indictment was made at that time.

In 1983 the defendant filed a motion in the superior court to bring forward and vacate the judgment. The defendant argued in his motion that because the indictment failed to allege a culpable mental state it was invalid and that, therefore, the superior court lacked jurisdiction to enter the judgment. The Superior Court (Bean, J.) dismissed the defendant's motion, and he brought this appeal. We affirm.

[1, 2] We have repeatedly stated that we will not consider on appeal issues not raised by exception, objection or motion in the trial court. See State v. Hopps, 123 N.H. 541, 545-46, 465 A.2d 1206, 1209 (1983); see also State v. Little, 123 N.H. 433, 437, 462 A.2d 117, 119 (1983); State v. Glidden, 123 N.H. 126, 132, 459 A.2d 1136, 1140 (1983). By his motion, the defendant is attempting to raise on appeal an issue not presented to the original trial court more than seven years ago. The scope of our review is well settled, and we will not depart from it.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Desmond

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham
Aug 13, 1984
480 A.2d 208 (N.H. 1984)
Case details for

State v. Desmond

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. WYCLIFFE L. DESMOND

Court:Supreme Court of New Hampshire Rockingham

Date published: Aug 13, 1984

Citations

480 A.2d 208 (N.H. 1984)
480 A.2d 208

Citing Cases

State v. Santana

It is unquestioned that, for this court to consider an issue on appeal, it must have been raised "by…

American Legion Post #49 v. Jefferson Ins. Co.

Therefore, we will not depart from our often-stated rule that issues will not be considered on appeal which…