From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Davis

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Dec 14, 2007
970 So. 2d 982 (La. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2007-KO-1208.

December 14, 2007.

Appeal from the Criminal District Court, Orleans Parish, No. 448-349, Section "H," Camille Buras, J.


Granted. Although the trial court sought to conform defendant's sentence to the requirements of La.R.S. 15:529.1(G) by amending the sentence originally imposed to deny eligibility for probation or suspension of sentence on the entire term of imprisonment, the court went too far when it also eliminated parole eligibility on the entire term of imprisonment. La.R.S. 15:529.1(G) does not purport to restrict parole eligibility on any habitual offender sentence, and the underlying offense of conviction, possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, subjects the offender to a sentence imposed without benefit of suspension of sentence, probation, and parole, only on the mandatory minimum term of imprisonment of two years at hard labor. La.R.S. 40:967(B)(4)(b). Accordingly, defendant's sentence is amended to provide that he serve 30 years imprisonment at hard labor without benefit of probation or suspension of sentence, and without benefit of parole on the first two years of the sentence. In all other respects, the application is denied.


Summaries of

State v. Davis

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Dec 14, 2007
970 So. 2d 982 (La. 2007)
Case details for

State v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Louisiana v. Benyale DAVIS

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Dec 14, 2007

Citations

970 So. 2d 982 (La. 2007)

Citing Cases

State v. Simmons

The writ was granted insofar as the district court restricted parole eligibility on the defendant's entire…

State v. Gilmore

Thus, although the trial court erred when it eliminated parole eligibility on the entire term of…