From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Dameron

Oregon Court of Appeals
May 30, 1990
101 Or. App. 237 (Or. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

D881992M; CA A60258

Argued and submitted March 5, 1990

Reversed April 4, 1990 Reconsideration denied May 30, 1990 Petition for review pending 1990

Appeal from District Court, Washington County.

Mark Gardner, Judge.

Steven L. Price, Hillsboro, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Rives Kistler, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Katherine H. Waldo, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Reversed.


Defendant appeals his conviction for criminal trespass in the second degree. ORS 164.245. He was gathering signatures on an initiative petition at the main entrance to the Raleigh Hills Fred Meyer store. He was asked to leave by an employee of the store and, when he refused, he was arrested for trespassing. He raised the defense that he had a constitutional right to be on the premises for the purpose of collecting signatures and that, therefore, the order for him to leave was not lawful under Article I, section 8, and Article IV, section 1, of the Oregon Constitution.

This case is not distinguishable from State v. Cargill, 100 Or. App. 336, 786 P.2d 208 (1990). Defendant established that he was engaged in a constitutionally protected activity, and the court erred in ruling that the order for defendant to leave the premises was lawful.

Reversed.


Summaries of

State v. Dameron

Oregon Court of Appeals
May 30, 1990
101 Or. App. 237 (Or. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

State v. Dameron

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. WILLIAM C. DAMERON, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: May 30, 1990

Citations

101 Or. App. 237 (Or. Ct. App. 1990)
789 P.2d 707

Citing Cases

State v. Dameron

On review from the Court of Appeals. Appeal from Washington County District Court, Mark Gardner, Judge. 101…

Lloyd Corporation v. Whiffen

Whether the state may protect that specie of private property by preventing speech, assembly, and petitioning…