From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Dade County

Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division A
Dec 20, 1955
84 So. 2d 41 (Fla. 1955)

Opinion

December 20, 1955.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Fritz Gordon, J.

George A. Brautigam, Miami, for appellant.

J. Mark Wilcox, Miami, for appellee.


This appeal is from a decree validating a proposed bond issue of Dade County Port Authority. The purpose of the bonds is to construct additional hangars and an office building for National Air Lines pursuant to the same lease agreement we were confronted with in State v. Dade County, Fla., 62 So.2d 404. The said lease agreement provided for additional construction from time to time upon request of National Air Lines.

The appeal having been perfected, appellee moves to affirm the judgment as provided by 30 F.S.A. Rule 38 of the Rules of this Court. We have examined the record and in our opinion the questions raised are concluded by State v. Dade County, supra. Since this is the case, it is manifest that they require no further argument so it becomes appropriate to invoke the provisions of Rule 38 to affirm the judgment. Cooksey v. Zimmerman, Fla., 85 So.2d 593.

The motion to affirm is accordingly granted on authority of Cooksey v. Zimmerman, supra, and the judgment appealed from is affirmed on authority of State v. Dade County, supra.

Affirmed.

O'CONNELL and BUFORD, JJ., and DICKINSON, Associate Justice, concur.


Summaries of

State v. Dade County

Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division A
Dec 20, 1955
84 So. 2d 41 (Fla. 1955)
Case details for

State v. Dade County

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT, v. DADE COUNTY, APPELLEE

Court:Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division A

Date published: Dec 20, 1955

Citations

84 So. 2d 41 (Fla. 1955)

Citing Cases

State v. County of Dade

These bonds were the subject of our decision in State v. Dade County, 1952, 62 So.2d 404. Thereafter, in June…