From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Cutshall

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Jul 6, 2017
906 N.W.2d 205 (Iowa Ct. App. 2017)

Summary

discussing the unreasonableness of the internet restriction given the defendant did not use the Internet in the underlying offense

Summary of this case from State v. R.K.

Opinion

No. 16-1646

07-06-2017

STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alexander CUTSHALL, Defendant-Appellant.

Mark C. Smith, State Appellate Defender, and Mary K. Conroy, Assistant Appellate Defender, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Darrel Mullins, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION

Sentence Vacated in part and Remanded for Resentencing.


Summaries of

State v. Cutshall

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Jul 6, 2017
906 N.W.2d 205 (Iowa Ct. App. 2017)

discussing the unreasonableness of the internet restriction given the defendant did not use the Internet in the underlying offense

Summary of this case from State v. R.K.
Case details for

State v. Cutshall

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alexander CUTSHALL…

Court:Court of Appeals of Iowa.

Date published: Jul 6, 2017

Citations

906 N.W.2d 205 (Iowa Ct. App. 2017)

Citing Cases

State v. R.K.

al. 2017) (holding a social media ban as a condition for the parolee was a "sweeping prohibition" which…