From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Curry

Missouri Court of Appeals, Kansas City District
Feb 9, 1976
533 S.W.2d 687 (Mo. Ct. App. 1976)

Opinion

No. KCD 27838.

February 9, 1976.

APPEAL FROM THE JACKSON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, FOREST W. HANNA, J.

Simon, Simon Katz, Kansas City, for appellant.

John C. Danforth, Atty. Gen., Preston Dean, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before DIXON, P. J., PRITCHARD, C. J., and WASSERSTROM, J.


Appellant's single point is, "The court erred in failing to sustain defendant's challenge for cause of the venireman Hale." This utterly fails to comply with Rule 84.04(d) [made applicable to criminal cases by Rule 28.18] in that there is no statement as to wherein and why the ruling of the court is claimed to be erroneous. Counsel should note the relevant remarks of Simeone, J., in L. L. v. V. F. L. and M. D. S., Inc., [Missouri Court of Appeals, St. Louis District, No. 37,061, decided January 20, 1976], relating to dismissal for improper briefing.

The appeal is dismissed.


Summaries of

State v. Curry

Missouri Court of Appeals, Kansas City District
Feb 9, 1976
533 S.W.2d 687 (Mo. Ct. App. 1976)
Case details for

State v. Curry

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT, v. NORMAN W. CURRY, APPELLANT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Kansas City District

Date published: Feb 9, 1976

Citations

533 S.W.2d 687 (Mo. Ct. App. 1976)

Citing Cases

Swamp Land Dist. No. 307 v. Glide

If the legislature intended to amend section 338 of the Code of Civil Procedure by amending section 3466 of…

State ex Rel. State Highway v. Nickerson

As a consequence, many appeals have been dismissed, pursuant to motion, for failure of the appellant to file…