From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Crane

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE
Nov 26, 2012
No. 65744-5-I (Wash. Ct. App. Nov. 26, 2012)

Opinion

65744-5-I

11-26-2012

STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. DANIEL CRANE, Appellant.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Dwyer, J.

The Washington Supreme Court granted the State's petition for review of our first opinion in this matter and remanded the case to us for reconsideration in light of its decision in State v. Guzman Nuñez, 174 Wn.2d 707, 285 P.3d 21 (2012).

In our first opinion, we followed State v. Bashaw, 169 Wn.2d 133, 234 P.3d 195 (2010), and vacated an exceptional sentence imposed following Daniel Crane's conviction of felony harassment. Because the trial court instructed the jury that it must be unanimous in order to answer "no" on the verdict form for the aggravating factors supporting the exceptional sentence, we determined that this instruction was erroneous under Bashaw.

In Guzman Nuñez, however, the Supreme Court overruled Bashaw, expressly approving the instruction given by the trial court in this case. Thus, there was no trial court error.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Crane

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE
Nov 26, 2012
No. 65744-5-I (Wash. Ct. App. Nov. 26, 2012)
Case details for

State v. Crane

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. DANIEL CRANE, Appellant.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE

Date published: Nov 26, 2012

Citations

No. 65744-5-I (Wash. Ct. App. Nov. 26, 2012)