From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Cote

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Feb 28, 2013
61 A.3d 1100 (Conn. 2013)

Opinion

2013-02-28

STATE of Connecticut v. Joseph COTE.

Neal Cone, senior assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Michele C. Lukban, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Neal Cone, senior assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Michele C. Lukban, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

After granting the defendant's motion to add a second certified issue, the defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 136 Conn.App. 427, 46 A.3d 256, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the trial court's decision admitting the testimony of a Rhode Island police officer on grounds that the evidence was admissible for proof of intent and to ‘complete the story of the charged crime’ and that the prejudicial effect did not outweigh the probative value?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that No. 09438 of the 2009 Public Acts did not apply retroactively?”


Summaries of

State v. Cote

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Feb 28, 2013
61 A.3d 1100 (Conn. 2013)
Case details for

State v. Cote

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. Joseph COTE.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Feb 28, 2013

Citations

61 A.3d 1100 (Conn. 2013)
308 Conn. 913

Citing Cases

State v. Cote

We also granted the defendant's subsequent motion for permission to add a second certified issue, namely,…