From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Cosey

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Jun 7, 1996
675 So. 2d 732 (La. 1996)

Opinion

No. 96-KK-1433

June 7, 1996

IN RE: State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writ; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Number KW96 1154; Parish of East Baton Rouge 19th Judicial District Court Div. "N" Number 7-90-596


Writs denied in part and granted in part. See per curiam.

PFC

JCW

HTL

CDK

JPV

MARCUS, J. not on panel.

JOHNSON, J. would deny the writ.

WRITS DENIED IN PART AND GRANTED IN PART.

Defendant's writ application seeking admission of the polygraph reports is denied. The polygraph reports constitute inadmissible evidence, and it is not sufficiently clear that the State, in stipulation, intended to facilitate introduction of the polygraph reports. In all events, the reports are inadmissible and their introduction does not serve the interest of the conducting of a fair and proper trial.

The State's application, insofar as it attempts to bar the polygraph reports, is granted consistent with the above action on defendant's writ application.

The remainder of the reports, per the stipulation, are admissible and State witnesses to explain them are to be allowed, except that these reports, too, should be excluded if the defense objects, then shows, and the trial judge determines, that defendant would not have entered the stipulation had he known that the polygraph reports would not be introduced.


Summaries of

State v. Cosey

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Jun 7, 1996
675 So. 2d 732 (La. 1996)
Case details for

State v. Cosey

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA vs. FRANK FORD COSEY

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Jun 7, 1996

Citations

675 So. 2d 732 (La. 1996)

Citing Cases

State v. Cosey

Moreover, the Court ruled, "[i]n all events, the reports are inadmissible and their introduction does not…