From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Cosentino

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Mar 13, 1972
477 S.W.2d 460 (Ark. 1972)

Opinion

No. 5690

Opinion delivered March 13, 1972

1. CRIMINAL LAW — UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF MARIJUANA — STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION. — The unlawful possession of marijuana is a misdemeanor in view of construction of the penalty provisions of the Uniform Controlled Substances Act of 1971.

2. CRIMINAL LAW — APPEAL FROM INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS IN MISDEMEANOR CASES — REVIEW. — In a case involving unlawful possession of marijuana, State's appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer dismissed for in a misdemeanor case the State cannot appeal from an interlocutory order.

Appeal from Pulaski Circuit Court, Fourth Division, Richard B. Adkisson, Judge; appeal dismissed.

Ray Thornton, Atty. Gen., by John D. Bridgeforth, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Paul Johnson and Louis Art Dodrill, for appellee.


The appellee was charged by information with the unlawful possession of marijuana, an offense described in the information as a felony. The appellee demurred to the information, on the ground that the asserted offense is only a misdemeanor under Article IV, 1, of Act 590 of 1971, the Uniform Controlled Substances Act. Ark. Stat. Ann. 82-2617 (Supp. 1971). This appeal is from an order sustaining the demurrer.

The trial court correctly held the offense to be a misdemeanor, for the reasons stated in Bennett v. State, also decided today. 252 Ark. 128, 477 S.W.2d 497. That holding, however, requires that the present appeal be dismissed, for in a misdemeanor case the State cannot appeal from an interlocutory order, such as the one sustaining a demurrer. State v. Langstaff, 231 Ark. 736, 332 S.W.2d 614 (1960). Without deciding the point, we call attention to the possibility that the State's privilege of appealing from interlocutory orders in felony cases, under Ark. Stat. Ann. 43-2706 (Repl. 1964), may have been abrogated by 13 and 14 of Act 333 of 1971. See Ark. Stat. Ann. 43-2706 and -2720.1 (Supp. 1971).

Appeal dismissed.

FOGLEMAN, J., concurs:

JOHN A. FOGLEMAN, Justice, concurring. I agree that the appeal should be dismissed. I do not agree that the offense charged was only a misdemeanor for the reasons stated in my opinion in Bennett v. State, 252 Ark. 128 477 S.W.2d 597.

Ark. Stat. Ann. 43-2706 (Repl. 1964) allowing interlocutory appeals by the State was repealed by Act 333 of 1941.


Summaries of

State v. Cosentino

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Mar 13, 1972
477 S.W.2d 460 (Ark. 1972)
Case details for

State v. Cosentino

Case Details

Full title:STATE Of Arkansas v. William COSENTINO

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Mar 13, 1972

Citations

477 S.W.2d 460 (Ark. 1972)
477 S.W.2d 460

Citing Cases

State v. Gibbons

Thus it is seen that 43-2706, supra, was repealed outright but 43-2720 and 43-2733 were not disturbed by Act…

Fight v. State

1964), a "catch-all" statute, which provides this punishment for all misdemeanors committed where the statute…