Opinion
Argued October 27, 1927 —
Decided December 15, 1927.
On error to the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 4 N.J. Mis. R. 683.
For the defendant in error, Joseph L. Smith.
For the plaintiff in error, Harold Simandl.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — TRENCHARD, MINTURN, BLACK, KATZENBACH, LLOYD, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.