From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Cooper

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Aug 1, 2012
Appellate Case No. 2010-162207 (S.C. Ct. App. Aug. 1, 2012)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2010-162207 Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-465

08-01-2012

The State, Respondent, v. Duval Melvin Cooper, Appellant.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.


Appeal From York County

Lee S. Alford, Circuit Court Judge


AFFIRMED


Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General David Spencer, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Kevin S. Brackett, of York, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM : Duval Melvin Cooper appeals his convictions of trafficking heroin and trafficking methamphetamine. He argues the trial court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict because insufficient evidence existed to show constructive possession of the drugs found in a duffle bag in the back of the van he was driving. We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Hernandez, 382 S.C. 620, 624, 677 S.E.2d 603, 605 (2009) ("Knowledge can be proven by the evidence of acts, declarations, or conduct of the accused from which the inference may be drawn that the accused knew of the existence of the prohibited substances."); State v. Williams, 346 S.C. 424, 430, 552 S.E.2d 54, 57 (Ct. App. 2001) ("Where contraband materials are found on premises under the control of the accused, this fact in and of itself gives rise to an inference of knowledge and possession which may be sufficient to carry the case to the jury." (citation and quotation marks omitted)); State v. Wise, 272 S.C. 384, 387-88, 252 S.E.2d 294, 296 (1979) (finding evidence the defendant was the owner and operator of a pickup truck containing marijuana was sufficient to create a jury question as to whether he was guilty of possession).

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

AFFIRMED.

WILLIAMS, THOMAS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Cooper

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Aug 1, 2012
Appellate Case No. 2010-162207 (S.C. Ct. App. Aug. 1, 2012)
Case details for

State v. Cooper

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Duval Melvin Cooper, Appellant.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Aug 1, 2012

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2010-162207 (S.C. Ct. App. Aug. 1, 2012)

Citing Cases

Cooper v. Stevenson

(ECF No. 25-3.) On August 1, 2012, the South Carolina Court of Appeals affirmed Cooper's conviction. (State…