From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Conger

Oregon Court of Appeals
May 12, 1993
120 Or. App. 220 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

90-10-1676-C; CA A72340

Argued and submitted October 28, 1992

Reversed and remanded with instructions May 12, 1993

Appeal from Circuit Court, Harney County.

F.J. Yraguen, Judge.

David E. Groom, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem.

Robert B. Rocklin, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Mary H. Williams, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.

Before Richardson, Chief Judge, and Deits and Durham, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded with instructions to quash the indictment.


Defendant appeals her conviction for delivery of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. In her first assignment, she contends that the court erred by denying her motion to quash the indictment on the ground that the grand jury that returned it had only six members. The parties stipulated that one grand juror had been excused during the time that the indictment in this case was being considered.

The court erred in denying the motion. Goodwin v. State of Oregon, 116 Or. App. 279, 840 P.2d 1372 (1992).

Reversed and remanded with instructions to quash the indictment.


Summaries of

State v. Conger

Oregon Court of Appeals
May 12, 1993
120 Or. App. 220 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

State v. Conger

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. IVY FRANCINE CONGER, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: May 12, 1993

Citations

120 Or. App. 220 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)
851 P.2d 636

Citing Cases

State v. Conger

Appeals from Harney County Circuit Court, F.J. Yraguen, Judge. State v. Conger, 125 Or. App. 355, 866 P.2d…

State v. Conger

WARREN, J. In a consolidated petition for review, the state seeks review of our decisions in State v. Conger,…