From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Collymore

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 25, 2017
324 Conn. 913 (Conn. 2017)

Opinion

01-25-2017

STATE of Connecticut v. Anthony COLLYMORE

Susan M. Hankins, assigned counsel, in support of the petition. Robert J. Scheinblum, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Susan M. Hankins, assigned counsel, in support of the petition.

Robert J. Scheinblum, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 168 Conn.App. 847, 148 A.3d 1059 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Whether the Appellate Court properly held that a prosecutor's grant of immunity to a witness for his testimony during the state's case-in-chief does not extend to the same witness' testimony when later called by the defendant as a witness?

"2. If the answer to the first question is no, was the error nonetheless harmless?

"3. Whether in-court identification testimony made by the victim's mother and brother, contrary to their pretrial statements, violated the defendant's due process rights pursuant to State v. Dickson, 322 Conn. 410, 141 A.3d 810 (2016) ?"

EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.


Summaries of

State v. Collymore

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 25, 2017
324 Conn. 913 (Conn. 2017)
Case details for

State v. Collymore

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. Anthony COLLYMORE

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Jan 25, 2017

Citations

324 Conn. 913 (Conn. 2017)
324 Conn. 913

Citing Cases

State v. Angel M.

We decline to do so because our supervisory authority is intended to be utilized sparingly and only in…

State v. Collymore

And (3) "[Did] in-court identification testimony made by the victim's mother and brother, contrary to their…