In Coleman, the defendant appealed the district court's restitution order, contending the court abused its discretion in using the replacement cost or original purchase price rather than the fair market value to determine the amount of restitution.
Summary of this case from State v. KarlyleNo. 92,302.
August 26, 2005.
Appeal from Sedgwick.
Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
In Coleman, the defendant appealed the district court's restitution order, contending the court abused its discretion in using the replacement cost or original purchase price rather than the fair market value to determine the amount of restitution.
Summary of this case from State v. KarlyleFull title:STATE v. COLEMAN
Court:Court of Appeals of Kansas
Date published: Aug 26, 2005
However, unlike Rhodes, Blackburn testified he purchased the cell phone, iPod touch, and handgun within the…