Opinion
January 13, 1879.
Alternative writ of mandamus to compel the issuance of bonds voted in aid of the St. Paul Chicago railway. The case made by the relator in the information and the alternative writ, is in substance as follows:
Long before March, 1868, the St. Paul Chicago Railway Co. was and still is a corporation authorized to construct and operate a railway from St. Paul, by way of Hastings, Red Wing, Lake City, etc., to Winona, in this state, and the relator was and is a corporation authorized to construct, equip, own and operate railways in any part of the state, and to enter into all contracts connected with the exercise of such powers. In March, 1868, and long prior thereto, and thereafter until February 26, 1872, the town of Lake City was a municipal corporation, with all the rights and powers belonging to towns in this state, and was composed of and embraced within its territorial limits the congressional township No. 111 north, of range 12 west, in Wabasha county, according to the United States survey. On March 6, 1868, while the railway company was engaged in constructing its railway, the legislature passed an act, entitled "An act to authorize the village of Lake City to aid in the construction of the St. Paul Chicago railway," (Sp. Laws. 1868, c 15,) which will be found in the margin. Division of Town — Liability for Old Debts. — It is constitutionally competent for the legislature to erect, out of a portion of the territory of an existing town, a new municipal corporation, without making any provision for the debts and liabilities of such town previously incurred. In such case, the old town remains solely responsible for such debts and liabilities, and no claim can be enforced against the new corporation in respect thereto, either in favor of the town or its creditors. Such legislation impairs no contract rights or obligations, though the taxable resources of the town may be thereby largely diminished, and though such debts may have been incurred upon the faith of a statutory pledge that the town would provide a sufficient sinking-fund, by taxation, to pay the same at maturity, it not appearing that its power so to do has been rendered ineffectual for that purpose.
Section 1. The town of Lake City may, at any time prior to August 1, 1870, by a vote of a majority of its supervisors, or their successors in official trust, subject to the approval and ratification of the legal voters of said village ( town) as hereinafter provided, create and issue its bonds, with interest coupons attached thereunto, to an amount not exceeding in the aggregate the sum of seventy-five thousand dollars, bearing interest at a rate not to exceed eight per cent. per annum, payable either annually or semi-annually, which bonds shall be payable at such place and at such time or times as shall be therein named, not exceeding twenty ( thirty) years, and to pledge the faith of said village, ( town,) or the municipal corporation which may succeed it, for the payment of the principal and interest of said bonds. The bonds hereby authorized, or the proceeds thereof, shall be used in the construction of the St. Paul Chicago railway.
Sec. 2. Before said bonds are issued, the question of issuing them shall be submitted to the legal voters of said village ( town) at any general or special election, thirty ( ten) days' notice to be given previous to said election, by publication in some newspaper published in said county of Wabasha, and the said supervisors, or their successors in official trust, are hereby authorized to appoint and call a special election for such purpose, which shall be conducted in manner and form as elections are usually conducted in said village ( town.) The voters at such election shall use ballots upon which shall he printed or written, or partly printed and partly written, the words "For Railway Bonds," or the words "Against Railway Bonds," as the voters shall choose. If a majority of the ballots so cast at such election shall have upon them the words "For Railway Bonds," then the said bonds shall be issued, and the said supervisors, or their successors in official trust, may make any and all such agreements as they may deem proper with said railway company, for or relating to the disposal of the said bonds, or the proceeds thereof, in aid of said railway. But if a majority of said ballots shall have the words "Against Railway Bonds" upon them, then the said bonds shall not be issued: provided, that the question of the issuing of such bonds may again, at any time or times prior to August 1, 1870, in like manner, be submitted to said legal voters, and with like effect.
Sec. 3. For the purpose of paying the principal and interest of said bonds, an annual tax shall be assessed and levied upon the taxable property of said village ( town,) in amount sufficient to pay the interest on the bonds so issued; and when the principal, or any part of the principal, is about to become due, a sufficient amount to pay such principal; and the payment of principal and interest may be apportioned upon such years as the said supervisors may deem expedient; or they may annually levy upon such taxable property, and cause to be set apart as a sinking-fund, such sums as, with the accrued interest thereon, shall amount to an equal proportion of the whole amount of bonds issued, which shall be applied to the punctual payment of said bonds at maturity. Said taxes shall be levied and collected in the same manner as other taxes are levied and collected in said village ( town,) or the municipal corporation which shall succeed it.
Sec. 4. This act shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage.
Municipal Bonds for Railway — Averment that Voters were influenced by False Promises. — The writ recites that the ordinance whose provisions are sought to be enforced against the town was duly passed by a vote of a majority of the supervisors of said town, and ratified by the legal voters thereof, at an election held for that purpose, pursuant to the statute authorizing it. In answer thereto, the respondent alleges, "that the St. Paul Chicago Railway Company, upon the passage of said ordinance, and as an additional and further inducement to pass the same, and also, to induce and influence the voters of said town to ratify said ordinance, falsely and fraudulently represented that said company would build its engine-houses, car and machine-shops in said town of Lake City, thereby increase the property of said town liable to taxation, and increase the population of said town to a great extent, which representations and promises were false and untrue, and only made for the purpose aforesaid." Held, that this portion of the answer or return is irrelevant and redundant, and should be stricken out.
Same — Corruption of Board of Town Supervisors by Company. — It is also alleged in said answer or return, as follows: "That before said ordinance was so passed by said supervisors as aforesaid, the said St. Paul Chicago Railway Company fraudulently and corruptly, and for the purpose of inducing the then supervisors of said town to pass the same, promised and agreed to and with the said supervisors, that if they would pass the said ordinance as aforesaid, the St. Paul Chicago Railway Company would locate the depot of said company in said town of Lake City, on the private property of said supervisors, and represented to said supervisors that by reason of such location, the said property of said supervisors would be greatly enhanced in value; that said supervisors, induced and influenced by said fraudulent and corrupt promise and agreement, and by other and further fraudulent and corrupt considerations then paid and promised to said supervisors by said company, passed the said ordinance; and said respondent, on its information and belief, alleges that the said supervisors would not have passed the same, but for the said fraudulent and corrupt promises and payments aforesaid." Held, that the matter contained in this portion of the answer or return is not irrelevant, and ought not to be stricken out as such.
Assignee of Chose in Action. — The assignee of a chose in action takes it subject to all defences, legal or equitable, existing against it in the hands of the assignor, at the time of the assignment.
Mandamus — Trial by Jury. — The right to a jury trial in respect to issues of fact in a proceeding by mandamus, instituted in this court, is not secured nor allowed to either party under the constitution of the state.
Bigelow, Flandrau Clark, for relator.
Thomas Wilson, for respondent, the city of Lake City.
H. D. Stocker and W. J. Hahn, for respondent, the town of Lake.
On the return-day of the alternative writ at the October term, 1877, both respondents made a motion to quash the writ as improvidently granted, on the grounds: (1) That the provisions of the act of March 6, 1868, entitled "An act to authorize the village of Lake City to aid in the construction of the St. Paul Chicago railway," (Sp. Laws 1868, c. 15,) were, as respects the town of Lake, then known by the corporate name of the town of Lake City, wholly nugatory, because the subject of that act, as indicated in its title, related to the "village," instead of the "town," of Lake City, and that the amendatory act of February 2, 1869, (Sp. Laws 1869, c. 41,) did not cure this defect. (2) Conceding the validity of such act as amended, and its application to the town of Lake City, the authority it conferred to create and issue bonds for the purpose named, expired on the first day of August, 1870, and as none had been formally executed and delivered under the act prior to that date, it is now too late to regain it; and (3) That the agreement entered into by the town, as evidenced by the ordinance, and set up in the writ, was without consideration and void. In addition to these grounds of objection common to both respondents, the city of Lake City made the further one that the writ would not lie as against it, because, being a new and distinct municipal
On February 2, 1869, while the railway was still in course of construction, the legislature passed an act, (Sp. Laws 1869, c. 41,) entitled "an act to amend" the act of 1868, and providing that such act "be and the same is hereby amended as follows, to wit: The word `town' shall be and is hereby substituted for and in the place of the word `village,' wherever it occurs in said act; and the word `thirty' likewise substituted for the word `twenty,' preceding the word `years,' in the first section of said act; and the word `ten' likewise substituted for the word `thirty' preceding the word `days,' in the second section of said act." These amendments are inserted in parentheses in the act printed in the note.
Pursuant to the authority given by these acts, and while the railway was still in course of construction, the town of Lake City by its board of supervisors duly convened on February 6, 1869, adopted an ordinance, which after referring to the acts of 1868 and 1869 as the authority for its passage, proceeds as follows:
"We, the supervisors of the town of Lake City, do ordain that, in order to aid the St. Paul Chicago Railway Co. in the construction of their railway, there shall be donated and delivered to the said company $75,000 of the bonds of the town of Lake City, bearing interest at the rate of six per cent. per annum," etc., "the principal to mature thirty years after the date of such bonds; and for the payment of which a sinking-fund shall be provided, to commence within ten years from the date aforesaid, sufficient to discharge the same at maturity: and provided, that said bonds shall not be delivered until said railway shall be constructed and in full operation, with cars running thereon, from St. Paul to Winona: and provided said railway shall be so completed and in operation on or before April 1, 1872; and for the delivery of said bonds and the payment of the interest and principal thereof, the faith and credit of said town of Lake City are hereby pledged.
"And it is further ordained that the question of issuing said bonds as aforesaid shall be submitted to the legal voters of said town of Lake City, at a special election, which is hereby appointed and ordered to be held on February 23, 1869; that at least ten days' notice of said election be given, by publishing such notice at least once in each week for two successive weeks in the Lake City Leader, together with a copy of this ordinance."
After providing for the manner of conducting the election, and canvassing the returns, the ordinance concludes: "And if the majority of the ballots so cast at such election shall have upon them the words `for railway bonds,' then the said bonds shall be issued and delivered, upon the terms and conditions above named, but not otherwise."
Publication was made and the election held and the votes canvassed as required by the ordinance, a large majority of votes being for the issue of the bonds.
Partly in consideration of the obligation of the town, thus contracted, to issue such bonds, the St. Paul Chicago Railway Co., on June 29, 1869, made a contract with the relator, the Minnesota Railway Construction Co., whereby the latter company agreed to build and equip the railway from St. Paul to Winona, and, among other considerations therefor, the former company agreed to and did sell, transfer and assign to the latter all gifts, donations, bounties or aid, in any form or shape, which then had been or might thereafter be given to it, by any person, corporation, municipality or state, to aid in the construction of such railway, including the bonds which the town of Lake City had thus obligated itself to issue and deliver, and all claim, right or demand of the railway company to or for such bonds, against such town. The relator still owns the claim and demand so transferred to it.
The St. Paul Chicago Railway Co., acting through the relator, proceeded with the construction of the railway, and had the same completed, with the cars running thereon, for the entire distance from St. Paul to Winona, and had in all respects complied with the terms of the ordinance, and had become entitled to the delivery of the bonds, by January 1, 1872.
On February 26, 1872, the legislature, with the consent and by the procurement of the inhabitants of the town of Lake City, passed an act entitled "An act to incorporate the city of Lake City," (Sp. Laws 1872, c. 15,) providing that all the district of country in the county of Wabasha, and state of Minnesota, contained within certain described limits "shall be a city by the name of Lake City, and the people now inhabiting, and those who shall hereafter inhabit, within the district of country herein described, shall be a municipal corporation by the name of Lake City," and conferring the usual powers of municipal corporations. All of the territory comprised in the city thus created (except such as includes part of the waters of Lake Pepin,) is included in township 111, and formed a part of the town of Lake City at the time of the passage and ratification of the ordinance before mentioned. Immediately upon the passage of the act, the new city was organized, and has ever since existed, with such territory and organization; and ever since the organization of the city, the town organization has been confined to what remained of its original territory after the city was thus carved out of it.
The act incorporating the city makes no provision whatever for the payment of any part of the debts or the assumption of any part of the obligations of the town of Lake City by the new city of Lake City, but is entirely silent on that subject, nor is there any general statute of the state, adjusting the debts or liabilities of the old town with the new city.
By an act of the legislature, approved March 6, 1873, (Sp. Laws 1873, c. 97,) it is provided "that the name of the township of Lake City, in the county of Wabasha, be and the same is hereby changed to the township of Lake," which name it still retains.
By the official assessment for the year 1876, the total valuation of taxable property in the city of Lake City is $1,072, 363, and in the town of Lake, $232,695.
The relator having, on its own behalf and that of the railway company, made a fruitless demand on the town and city, this proceeding was instituted to compel them to issue their joint and several bonds to the relator, of the character and to the amount provided in the ordinance.
On the return-day of the alternative writ, motions were made by the respondents that the writ be quashed; and these being overruled, and the respondents having answered, the relator moved to strike out portions of the answer; and a motion was also made by respondents for a jury trial. The grounds of each of these motions are stated in the opinion.