From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Charles Investment Corporation

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 2, 1978
76 N.J. 86 (N.J. 1978)

Opinion

Argued April 11, 1978 —

Decided May 2, 1978.

Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Harold F. Kuskin argued the cause for appellant ( Messrs. Wilentz, Goldman and Spitzer, attorneys; Ms. M. Kathleen Duncan, on the brief).

Mr. Philip F. Mattia, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent ( Mr. John J. Degnan, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Mr. Stephen Skillman, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).


The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinions of the Appellate Division, reported at 151 N.J. Super. 14 (1977), and the Law Division, reported at 143 N.J. Super. 541 (1976).

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES, Justices SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER and HANDLER and Judge CONFORD — 7.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

State v. Charles Investment Corporation

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 2, 1978
76 N.J. 86 (N.J. 1978)
Case details for

State v. Charles Investment Corporation

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BY THE COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: May 2, 1978

Citations

76 N.J. 86 (N.J. 1978)
385 A.2d 1227

Citing Cases

Lima Sons, Inc. v. Borough of Ramsey

The pronouncement in Antonelli must be read in conjunction with High Horizons Dev. Co., supra. See also…

Uricoli v. Police Fire. Retirem. Sys

Instead we have devised a legal standard that can give some expression to both our conflicting ideas of…